Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
- A. P. Dineshbabu
- Prathibha Rohit
- G. Maheswarudu
- Josileen Jose
- P. T. Sarada
- Lakshmi Pillai
- Rekha Devi Chakraborty
- Gyanranjan Dash
- Anulekshmi Chellappan
- Shubhadeep Ghosh
- G. B. Purushottama
- Rajan Kumar
- M. Rajkumar
- Indira Divipala
- D. Nakhava Ajay
- R. Ratheeshkumar
- K. V. Akhilesh
- V. Mahesh
- Swathipriyanka Sen
- Rajesh Pradhan
- Shikha Rahangdale
- R. Vinothkumar
- Shoba Joe Kizhakudan
- K. M. Rajesh
- R. Narayanakumar
- P. S. Swathilekshmi
- S. S. Raju
- M. Sivadas
- M. Muktha
- T. M. Najmudeen
- Divya Karnad
- Dipani Sutaria
- Merwyn Fernandes
- Trisha Gupta
- Naveen Namboothri
- Vardhan Patankar
- Swatipriyanka Sen
- Sijo P. Varghese
- A. Biju Kumar
- Alissa Barnes
- K. K. Bineesh
- Sajan John
- Mayuresh Gangal
- M. Hashim
- Vinod Malayilethu
- Zoya Tyabji
- Malaika Vaz
- Sandhya Sukumaran
- Livi Wilson
- Rekha J. Nair
- L. Remya
- P. P. Manojkumar
- K. Sivakumar
- E. Vivekanandan
- P. U. Zacharia
- A. Gopalakrishnan
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Thomas, Sujitha
- Marine Spatial Planning for Resource Conservation, Fisheries Management and for Ensuring Fishermen Security–Global Perspectives and Indian Initiatives
Abstract Views :233 |
PDF Views:72
Authors
Affiliations
1 Mangalore Research Centre of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Hoige Bazar, Mangaluru 575 001, IN
2 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, IN
1 Mangalore Research Centre of Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Hoige Bazar, Mangaluru 575 001, IN
2 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 116, No 4 (2019), Pagination: 561-567Abstract
Internationally, marine spatial planning (MSP) is an integral part of the decision-making protocol for setting up activities in the marine zone, be it the establishment of industries, exploration and mining for oil and minerals, deciding of surface transport, ensuring national security, exploitation of living and non-living resources, or conservation and management of resources and ecosystems. Satellite-based technologies like remote sensing and geographic information system are two powerful tools that provide a common platform to present information on different activities from the marine zone. This would enable the planners and policymakers to interpret the interaction between various factors and derive judicious decisions on the allocation of space and resources to different segments or activities in marine zone. This article reviews how MSP is being used as a decisionsupport tool in various countries for the peaceful coexistence of different stakeholders in the marine zone. It also discusses initiatives in India along with a reminder on the responsibility of the country as a signatory of international organizations to give importance on developing MSP for the conservation of resources as well as marine ecosystems.Keywords
Fishermen Security, Mariculture, Marine Spatial Planning, Resource Conservation, Satellite-Based Technology.References
- Jay, S. et al., Coastal and marine spatial planning. In Ocean Yearbook (eds Chircop, S., Smout, C. and McConnell, M.), Brill, Leiden, The Netherlands, 2013, pp. 171–212.
- Douvre, F., The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem based seas use management. Mar. Policy, 2008, 32, 762–771.
- Agenda 21 adopted at UNCED, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3–14 June 1992; http://www.un.org/ESA/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agens21.pdf
- Report of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity on its Thirteenth Meeting, Cancun, Mexico, 4–17 December 2016; https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/ccf8/86e1/258e841f696315c3212d9259/cop-13-25-en.pdf
- Day, J., Zoning: lesson from Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Ocean Coast. Manage., 2002, 45, 139–156.
- Liu, Y., Feng, A. and Wu, S., Assessment methods and case study of the implementation of marine functional zoning. Ocean Dev. Manage., 2009, 26, 12–17.
- Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries, Comprehensive Marine Fishing Policy. Planning Commission, Government of India, 2004.
- Radhakrishnan, E. V. and Dineshbabu, A. P., Regulatory framework for mariculture development and management. In Handbook on Opensea Cage Culture, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Karwar, 2012, pp. 15–26.
- Marine Census 2010, Ministry of Agriculture, Krishi Bhavan, New Delhi and CMFRI, Kochi, Part I is India, CMFRI, Kochi, 2012.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Thomas, S. and Dinesh, A. C., Handbook on Application of GIS as a Decision Support Tool in Marine Fisheries, CMFRI Spec Publ. No. 121, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2016, p. 104.
- CMFRI Annual Report 2016–2017, Technical Report. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2017, pp. 34–35.
- Jentoft, S. and Knol, M., Marine spatial planning: risk or opportunity for fisheries in the North Sea? Marit. Stud., 2014, 12(13), 1–116.
- Kao, S. L. and Chang, K. Y., Study on fuzzy GIS for navigation safety of fishing boats. J. Mar. Eng. Technol., 2017, 16(2), 83– 84.
- Calamia, M. A. A., Methodology for incorporating traditional ecological knowledge with geographic information systems for marine resource management in the Pacific. In SPC Traditional Marine Resource Management and Knowledge Information Bulletin #10, 1999, pp. 2–12.
- Aswani, S. and Lauer, M., Incorporating fishermen’s local knowledge and behavior into geographical information systems (GIS) for designing marine protected areas in Oceania. Human Org., 2006, 65(1), 81–102.
- Chang, S.-K., Liu, K.-Y. and Song, Y.-H., Distant water fisheries development and vessel monitoring system implementation in Taiwan – history and driving forces. Mar. Policy, 2010, 34, 541– 548.
- Srinath, M., An appraisal of the exploited marine fishery resources of India. In Status of Exploited Marine Fishery Resources of India (eds Mohan Joseph, M. and Jayaprakash, A. A.), CMFRI, Cochin, 2003, pp. 1–17.
- Butler, M. J. A., LeBlanc, C., Belbin, J. A. and MacNeill, J. L., Marine resource mapping: an introductory manual. FAO Fish. Tech. Paper No. 274, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Rome, 1986, p. 256.
- Meaden, G. J. and Do Chi, T., Geographical information systems: applications to machine fisheries. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 356. Rome, FAO, 1996, p. 335.
- Rubec, J. P., Introduction to a Special Section: Spatial Analysis, Mapping, and Management of Marine Fisheries. Mar. Coast. Fish., 2016, 8(1), 132–134.
- Halpern, B. S., Walbridge, S. and Selkoe, K. A., A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science, 2008, 319, 948– 952.
- Dayton, P. K., Thrush, S. F., Agardy, M. T. and Hofman, R. J., Environmental effects of marine fishing. Mar. Freshwater Ecosyst., 1995, 5, 205–232.
- Jackson, J. B. C. et al., Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science, 2001, 293, 629.
- Black, J., Wood, R., Berthelsen, T. and Tilney, R., Monitoring New Zealand’s trawl footprint for deepwater fisheries: 1989–1990 to 2009–2010. In New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report, Ministry of Primary Industries, New Zealand, 2001, report no. 110, p. 57.
- Daniel, D. C., Boustany, A. M. and Halpin, P. N., Spatio-temporal management of fisheries to reduce by-catch and increase fishing selectivity. Fish Fish., 2011, 12, 110–119.
- Sivakami, S., Observations on the demersal fishery resources of the coastal and deep sea areas of the Exclusive Economic Zone of India. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Scientific Results of FORV Sagar Sampada, 1990, pp. 315–330.
- Suseelan, C., Nandakumar, G. and Rajan, K. N., Results of bottom trawling by FORV Sagar Sampada with special reference to catch and abundance of edible crustaceans. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Scientific Results of FORV Sagar Sampada, 1990, pp. 337–346.
- Suseelan, C. et al., Further observations on the spatial distribution and population characteristics of ‘karikkadi’ prawn (Parapenaeopsis stylifera) along the Kerala coast during monsoon season. Indian J. Fish., 1998, 45(3), 285–292.
- CMFRI Annual Report 2014–2015, CMFRI, Kochi, 2015, pp. 25– 29.
- Rohit, P. et al., Management plans for the Marine Fisheries of Karnataka. Marine Fisheries Policy Series-5. CMFRI, Kochi, 2016, pp. 1–110.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Thomas, S. and Shailaja, S., Efficacy of spatial study on catch and effort from fishing vessels for strengthening fisheries management. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 2017, 59(1), 31– 35.
- Kapetsky, J. M. and Aguilar-Manjarrez, J., Geographic information systems, remote sensing and mapping for the development and management of marine aquaculture. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 458, Rome, FAO, 2007, p. 125.
- Vanessa, S., Gimpel, A., Gopnik, M. and Gee, K., Aquaculture site-selection and marine spatial planning: the roles of GIS-based tools and models. In Aquaculture Perspective of Multi-Use Sites in the Open Ocean (eds Buck, B. H. and Langan, R.), Springer Open, 2017, pp. 131–148.
- UN General Assembly, Convention on the Law of the Sea, Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 United Nations Treaty Series 397. Enacted as: entered into force as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on 1 November 1994.
- Devaraj, M. and Vivekanandan, E., Marine capture fisheries of India: Challenges and opportunities. Curr. Sci., 1999, 76(3), 314– 332.
- Bycatch in Indian trawl fisheries and some suggestions for trawl bycatch mitigation
Abstract Views :117 |
PDF Views:60
Authors
A. P. Dineshbabu
1,
Sujitha Thomas
1,
Josileen Jose
1,
P. T. Sarada
1,
Lakshmi Pillai
1,
Rekha Devi Chakraborty
1,
Gyanranjan Dash
1,
Anulekshmi Chellappan
1,
Shubhadeep Ghosh
1,
G. B. Purushottama
1,
Rajan Kumar
1,
M. Rajkumar
1,
Indira Divipala
1,
D. Nakhava Ajay
1,
R. Ratheeshkumar
1,
K. V. Akhilesh
1,
V. Mahesh
1,
Swathipriyanka Sen
1,
Rajesh Pradhan
1,
Shikha Rahangdale
1,
R. Vinothkumar
1,
Shoba Joe Kizhakudan
1,
K. M. Rajesh
1,
R. Narayanakumar
1,
P. S. Swathilekshmi
1,
S. S. Raju
1,
G. Maheswarudu
1,
M. Sivadas
1
Affiliations
1 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, India, IN
1 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, India, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 123, No 11 (2022), Pagination: 1372-1380Abstract
Globally, trawl is the major fishing gear used in marine fisheries and in India, it contributes to more than one-third of the marine fish production. Trawl fishing has been critically evaluated from a sustainability perspective, especially analysing its bycatch composition. Most of the bycatch from trawlers contains valuable edible species with high market demand. However, a portion of the bycatch which does not have such demand in the edible fish market, known as low-value bycatch (LVB), continues to be a matter of concern from an ecological and economic perspective. During 2017–19, 30–60% of trawl landing in India was constituted by LVB, which was mainly used for fishmeal preparation. To enhance the value and utility of LVB, this study explores the possibility of converting waste from LVB into edible resources using pufferfish and triggerfish. It also highlights the positive impact of efforts by different Government agencies for bycatch mitigation like the implementation of minimum legal size in reducing the juvenile component in bycatch, with a social survey-based account of fisher’s perceptions and suggestions on successful bycatch mitigationKeywords
Ecological impacts, fishery economics, low-value bycach, minimum legal size, trawl.References
- Jennings, S. and Kaiser, M. J., The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems. Adv. Mar. Biol., 1998, 34, 201–352.
- Freese, L., Auster, P. J., Heifetz, J. and Wing, B. L., Effects of trawling on seafloor habitat and associated invertebrate taxa in the Gulf of Alaska. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 1999, 189, 119–126.
- Jennings, S., Nicholson, M. D., Dinmore, T. A. and Lancaster, J., The effect of chronic trawling disturbance on the production of infaunal communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 2002, 243, 251–260.
- Collie, J., Hiddink, J. G., van Kooten, T., Rijnsdorp, A. D., Kaiser, M. J., Jennings, S. and Hilborn, R., Indirect effects of bottom fishing on the productivity of marine fish. Fish Fish., 2017, 18, 619–637.
- George, M. J., Suseelan, C. and Balan, K., By-catch of shrimp fish-eries in India. Mar. Fish. Inf. Serv. T&E Ser., 1981, 28, 3–13.
- Gordon, A., The bycatch from Indian shrimp trawlers in the Bay of Bengal: the potential for its improved utilization. Bay of Bengal Programme, Natural Resources Institute, Overseas Development Administration, Madras. BOBP/WP/68, 1991, p. 32.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Sujitha, T. and Salian, S., Impact of trawling in Indian waters – a review. Fish. Technol., 2016, 53, 263–272.
- Kizhakudan, S. J., Lakshmi, P. S., Gomathy, S., Thirumilu, P. and Poovannan, P., Assessment of low-value by-catch (LVB) in bottom trawl landing at Kasimedu, Chennai during 2006–2011. Mar. Fish.Inf. Serv. T&E Ser., 2013, 218, 23–26.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Sujitha, T. and Vivekanandan, E., Assessment of low value bycatch and its application for management of trawl fisheries. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 2014, 56(1), 103–108.
- Mohamed, K. S. et al., Minimum legal size (MLS) of capture to avoid growth overfishing of commercially exploited fish and shellfish species of Kerala. Mar. Fish. Infor. Serv. T&E Ser., 2014, 220, 3–7.
- Madhu, V. R., Raphael, L., Jeevan, J., Antony, V. T. and Edwin, L., Status of by-catch from commercial trawlers operated off Central Kerala. Fish. Technol., 2017, 54, 162–169.
- Muktha, M. et al., Policy guidance on sustaining the marine fisheries of Andhra Pradesh. CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy (9). ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2018, pp. 1–62.
- Mahesh, V., Dineshbabu, A. P., Naik, A. S. K., Anjanayappa, H.N., Vijaykumar, M. E. and Khavi, M., Characterization of low value by-catch in trawl fisheries off Karnataka coast, India and its impact on juveniles of commercially important fish species. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci., 2019, 48(12), 1733–1742.
- Behera, P. R., Ghosh, S., Sreeramulu, K., Muktha, M., Jishnudev, M. A. and Satish, K. M., The cost of fishing on juveniles of finfish and shellfish: assessment of economic impacts of trawl juvenile by-catch along the coast of North Andhra Pradesh, India. Thalassas, 2021, 37, 409–426.
- Christensen, V., Managing fisheries involving predator species and prey. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 1996, 6, 417–442.
- Dineshbabu, A. P. and Radhakrishnan, E. V., Trawl fishery of juve-nile fishes along Mangalore–Malpe coast of Karnataka and its impact on fish stock. Asian Fish. Sci., 2009, 22(2), 491–500.
- Costa, M. E., Erzini, K. and Borges, T. C., Bycatch of crustacean and fish bottom trawl fisheries from southern Portugal (Algarve).Sci. Mar., 2008, 72(4), 801–814.
- Garces, L. R. et al., Spatial structure of demersal fish assemblages in south and southeast Asia and implications for fisheries manage-ment. Fish. Res., 2006, 78(2–3), 143–157.
- Nightingale, A., A feminist in the forest: situated knowledge and mixing methods in natural resource management. ACME, 2003, 2(1), 77–90.
- Sruthy, I. S., Anju and Ram Mohan, M. K., Fish meal industry: a perspective towards food security and focused research needs.MPEDA Newsl., 2020, 7(10), 44–47.
- Aswathy, N. and Narayanakumar, R., Economic and environmental implications of trawl fishing: an analysis in Munambam fishing harbour on the south west coast of India. Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol., 2020, 39(13), 89–93.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Sujitha, T. and Dinesh, A. C., Handbook on Ap-plication of GIS as a Decision Support Tool in Marine Fisheries, CMFRI Special Publication No. 121, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2016, p. 104.
- Madhu, V. R., A review of trawl selectivity studies carried out along Indian coast. Fish. Technol., 2018, 55, 1–18.
- Squires, D., Balance, L. T., Dagorn, L., Dutton, P. H. and Lent, R., Mitigating bycatch: novel insights to multidisciplinary approaches.Front. Mar. Sci.. 2021, 8, 1–19.
- Boopendranath, M. R., Waste minimization in fishing operations.Fis. Technol., 2012, 49, 109–119.
- Vivekanandan, E., Seasonal fishing ban: need for collecting and applying right type of scientific information. Mar. Fish Inform.Serv. T&E Ser., 2019, 240, 7–16.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Sujitha, T. and Radhakrishnan, E. V., Spatio-temporal analysis and impact assessment of trawl bycatch of Karna-taka to suggest operation based fishery management options. IndianJ. Fish., 2012, 59(2), 27–38.
- Graham, N., Ferro, R. S. T., Karp, W. A. and MacMullen, P., Fishing practice, gear design, and the ecosystem approach – three case studies demonstrating the effect of management strategy on gear selectivity and discards. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2007, 64, 744–750.
- Mohamed, K. S. et al., Report of the committee to evaluate fish wealth and impact of trawl ban along Kerala coast, Department of Fisheries, Government of Kerala, 2014, p. 85.
- Rohit, Prathibha et al., Marine Fisheries Policy Series-5; Manage-ment Plans for the Marine Fisheries of Karnataka. CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy (5). ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research In-stitute, Kochi, 2016, p. 110.
- Haraksingh, T. S., James, D., Toppe, J., Subasinghe, R. and Karuna-sagar, I., Maximizing the contribution of fish to human nutrition. In Second International Conference on Nutrition: Better Nutrition Better Lives, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy and World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
- Saha, P., Sujitha, T., Salian, S., Dineshbabu, A. P., Rohit, P. and Nataraja, G. D., Fishery and GIS based spatio-temporal distribution analysis of smooth blaasop, Lagocephalus inermis in southeastern Arabian Sea. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2019, 20(4), 267–278.
- Pramod, G., Illegal, unreported and unregulated marine fish catches in the Indian exclusive economic zone. Field Report, Policy and Ecosystem Restoration in Fisheries, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, BC, Vancouver, Canada, 2010, p. 30.
- Elasmobranch Conservation, Challenges and Management Strategy in India : Recommendations from a National Consultative Meeting
Abstract Views :111 |
PDF Views:64
Authors
K. V. Akhilesh
1,
Shoba Joe Kizhakudan
1,
M. Muktha
1,
T. M. Najmudeen
1,
Sujitha Thomas
1,
Divya Karnad
2,
Dipani Sutaria
3,
Merwyn Fernandes
4,
Trisha Gupta
5,
Naveen Namboothri
5,
Vardhan Patankar
6,
Swatipriyanka Sen
1,
Sijo P. Varghese
7,
A. Biju Kumar
8,
Alissa Barnes
5,
K. K. Bineesh
9,
Sajan John
10,
Mayuresh Gangal
11,
M. Hashim
12,
Vinod Malayilethu
13,
Zoya Tyabji
6,
Malaika Vaz
14,
Sandhya Sukumaran
1,
G. B. Purushottama
1,
Livi Wilson
1,
V. Mahesh
1,
Rekha J. Nair
1,
L. Remya
1,
Shikha Rahangdale
1,
P. P. Manojkumar
1,
K. Sivakumar
15,
E. Vivekanandan
1,
P. U. Zacharia
1,
A. Gopalakrishnan
1
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, IN
2 Department of Environmental Studies, Ashoka University, Sonipat 131 029, IN
3 9 Aranya Farms, Shilaj, Ahmedabad 382 115, IN
4 TRAFFIC India Office, New Delhi 110 003, IN
5 Dakshin Foundation, #1818, 9th Cross, 5th Main Road, Sahakar Nagar, Bengaluru 560 092, IN
6 Wildlife Conservation Society-India, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, 2nd Phase, Bengaluru 560 097, IN
7 Fishery Survey of India, Cochin Base, Kochi 682 005, IN
8 Department of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram 695 581, IN
9 Zoological Survey of India, Chennai 600 028, IN
10 Wildlife Trust of India, Delhi 201 301, IN
11 Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysuru 570 017, IN
12 Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology, Kochi 682 508, IN
13 WWF-India, ‘Prasanthi’, Kadavanthra, Kochi 682 020, IN
14 Untamed Planet Films, Bengaluru 560 001, IN
15 Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun 248 001, IN
1 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, IN
2 Department of Environmental Studies, Ashoka University, Sonipat 131 029, IN
3 9 Aranya Farms, Shilaj, Ahmedabad 382 115, IN
4 TRAFFIC India Office, New Delhi 110 003, IN
5 Dakshin Foundation, #1818, 9th Cross, 5th Main Road, Sahakar Nagar, Bengaluru 560 092, IN
6 Wildlife Conservation Society-India, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, 2nd Phase, Bengaluru 560 097, IN
7 Fishery Survey of India, Cochin Base, Kochi 682 005, IN
8 Department of Aquatic Biology & Fisheries, University of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram 695 581, IN
9 Zoological Survey of India, Chennai 600 028, IN
10 Wildlife Trust of India, Delhi 201 301, IN
11 Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysuru 570 017, IN
12 Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology, Kochi 682 508, IN
13 WWF-India, ‘Prasanthi’, Kadavanthra, Kochi 682 020, IN
14 Untamed Planet Films, Bengaluru 560 001, IN
15 Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun 248 001, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 124, No 3 (2023), Pagination: 292-303Abstract
Historically, India has been projected as one of the major elasmobranch fishing nations in the world. However, management and conservation efforts are not commensurate with this trend. Along with the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, several generic conservation measures are in place at the regional/local level. But India is still a long way from meeting global conservation commitments. We present here the status of elasmobranch management and conservation in India, with the specific objective of identifying the gaps in the existing set-up. We also present recommendations based on a national consultative workshop held at the Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, in February 2020. We recommend the implementation of a National Plan of Action (NPOA-Sharks) and more inclusive governance and policymaking for elasmobranch conservation in India.Keywords
Consultative Meeting, Elasmobranch, Fisheries, Management and Conservation, Regulations.References
- Dulvy, N. K. et al., Extinction risk and conservation of the world’s sharks and rays. Elife, 2014, 3, e00590; https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.005.
- Stevens, J. D., Bonfil, R., Dulvy, N. K. and Walker, P. A., The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2000, 57, 476–494.
- Worm, B. et al., Global catches, exploitation rates, and rebuilding options for sharks. Mar. Policy, 2013, 40, 194–204.
- Dulvy, N. K. et al., Overfishing drives over one-third of all sharks and rays toward a global extinction crisis. Curr. Biol., 2021, 31(21), 4773–4787.
- Pacoureau, N. et al., Half a century of global decline in oceanic sharks and rays. Nature, 2021, 589(7843), 567–571.
- Ferretti, F., Worm, B., Britten, G. L., Heithaus, M. R. and Lotze, H. K., Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean. Ecol. Lett., 2010, 13, 1055–1071.
- Clarke, S., Milner-Gulland, E. J. and Trond, B., Social, economic, and regulatory drivers of the shark fin trade. Mar. Resour. Econ., 2007, 22(3), 305–327.
- Cardeñosa, D. et al., CITES-listed sharks remain among the top species in the contemporary fin trade. Conserv. Lett., 2018, 11(4), e12457.
- Cardeñosa, D., Fields, A. T., Babcock, E. A., Shea, S. K. H., Feldheim, K. A. and Chapman, D. D., Species composition of the largest shark fin retail-market in mainland China. Sci. Rep., 2020, 10(1), 12914; doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69555-1.
- James, P. S. B. R., Sharks, rays and skates as a potential fishery resource off the east coast of India. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Living Resources of the Seas around India, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mandapam Camp, 1973, pp. 483–494.
- Jabado, R. W. et al., Troubled waters: threats and extinction risk of the sharks, rays and chimaeras of the Arabian Sea and adjacent waters. Fish Fish., 2018, 19(6), 1043–1062.
- Martins, A. P. B. et al., Analysis of the supply chain and conservation status of sharks (Elasmobranchii: Superorder Selachimorpha) based on fisher knowledge. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13(3), e0193969; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193969.
- Barbosa-Filho, M. L. V., Hauser-Davis, R. A., Siciliano, S., Dias, T. L. P., Alves, R. R. N. and Costa-Neto, E. M., Historical shark meat consumption and trade trends in a global richness hotspot. Ethnobiol. Lett., 2019, 10(1), 97–103.
- Karnad, D., Sutaria, D. and Jabado, R. W., Local drivers of declining shark fisheries in India. Ambio, 2020, 49(2), 616–627.
- Kizhakudan, S. J., Zacharia, P. U., Thomas, S., Vivekanandan, E. and Muktha, M., Guidance on National Plan of Action for Sharks in India, CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy Series-2, ICAR-CMFRI, Kochi, 2015, pp. 1–102; ISBN ISSN 2394-8019.
- Day, F., The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma, Fishes, London, UK, 1889, vol. 1, pp. i–xviii, 1–548, figures 1–164; vol. 2, pp. i–xiv, 1–509, figures 1–177.
- Hanfee, F., Trade in Sharks and Shark Products in India, TRAFFIC-India, New Delhi, 1997, pp. 1–50.
- Vannuccini, S., Shark utilization, marketing and trade. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 389, FAO, Rome, Italy, 1999, pp. 1–470.
- Dent, F. and Clarke, S., State of the global market for shark products. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 590, FAO, Rome, Italy, 2015, pp. 1–187.
- Okes, N. and Sant, G., An Overview of Major Shark Traders, Catchers, and Species, TRAFFIC, Cambridge, UK, 2019, pp. 1–38.
- CMFRI, Annual Report 2020, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2020, p. 284.
- Edwards, H., When predators become prey: the need for International shark conservation. Ocean Coastal L. J., 2006, 12(2), 305–354.
- Bhatt, J. R. and Vivekanandan, E., Coastal and marine biodiversity conservation in India. In Regional Symposium on Ecosystem Approaches to Marine Fisheries & Biodiversity, Kochi, 2013.
- White, W. T. and Kyne, P. M., The status of chondrichthyan conservation in the Indo-Australasian region. J. Fish Biol., 2010, 76(9), 2090–2117.
- Booth, H., Squires, D. and Milner-Gulland, E. J., The neglected complexities of shark fisheries, and priorities for holistic risk-based management. Ocean Coast. Manage, 2019, 182, 104994.
- Bräutigam, A. et al., Global priorities for conserving sharks and rays: a 2015–2025 strategy. Global Sharks and Rays Initiative, 2015.
- Dulvy, N. K. et al., Challenges and priorities in shark and ray conservation. Curr. Biol., 2017, 27, R565–R572; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.04.038.
- Yan, H. F. et al., Overfishing and habitat loss drive range contraction of iconic marine fishes to near extinction. Sci. Adv., 2021, 7(7), eabb6026; doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb6026.
- Akhilesh, K. V. et al., Status of sawfishes (Pristidae: Rhinopristiformes) in Indian waters. In Book of Abstracts, 12th Indian Fisheries and Aquaculture Forum, Chennai, India, 5–7 May 2022, p. 670.
- Akhilesh, K. V. et al. (eds), Report of the Consultative Workshop on Threatened and Protected Elasmobranchs of India: Conservation Status and Policy Needs, ICAR-CMFRI, Kochi, 4–6 February 2020, pp. 1–32.
- Mohamed, K. S. et al., Depleted and collapsed marine fish stocks along southwest coast of India – a simple criterion to assess the status. In Coastal Fishery Resources of India: Conservation and Sustainable Utilisation, Society of Fisheries Technologists, Cochin, 2010, pp. 67–76.
- Davidson, L. N., Krawchuk, M. A. and Dulvy, N. K., Why have global shark and ray landings declined: improved management or overfishing? Fish Fish., 2016, 17(2), 438–458.
- Sen, S. et al., Population dynamics and stock assessment of milk shark, Rhizoprionodon acutus (Ruppell, 1837) along Gujarat coast of India. Indian J. Mar. Sci., 2017, 46(5), 936–946.
- Dash, S. S. et al., Population dynamics and stock assessment of spadenose shark Scoliodon laticaudus Muller and Henle 1839 along Gujarat coast of India. Indian J. Mar. Sci., 2019, 48(4), 423–433.
- Sathianandan, T. V. et al., Status of Indian marine fish stocks: modelling stock biomass dynamics in multigear fisheries. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2021, 78(5), 1744–1757.
- Roy, S. D. and George, G., Marine resources of islands: status and approaches for sustainable exploitation/conservation with special emphasis to Andaman and Nicobar. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 2010, 80(4), 57–62.
- Tyabji, Z., Wagh, T., Patankar, V., Jabado, R. W. and Sutaria, D., Catch composition and life history characteristics of sharks and rays (Elasmobranchii) landed in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. PLoS ONE, 2020, 15(10), e0231069; https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231069.
- Kiruba-Sankar, R., Lohith Kumar, K., Saravanan, K. and Praveenraj, J., Poaching in Andaman and Nicobar coasts: insights. J. Coast. Conserv., 2019, 23, 95–109; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-018-0640-y.
- CMFRI, Annual Report 2019. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2019, p. 364.
- CMFRI, Annual Report 2018–19. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2019, p. 320.
- Camhi, M., Sharks and their Relatives – Ecology and Conservation (No. 20), IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 1998, pp. 1–39.
- Kizhakudan, S. J. et al., Report of FAO–CMFRI collaborative project: a study of shark and ray non-fin commodities in India. ICAR-CMFRI, Kochi, 2020, pp. 1–127.
- Mukesh, S. P., Pandey, S. and Ramalingam, L., Marine fisheries data collection methods in India – an update. IOTC-2019-WPM10-21, 2019, p. 5; https://www.iotc.org/fr/documents/WPM/10/21
- Srinath, M., Kuriakose, S. and Mini, K. G., Methodology for the Estimation of Marine Fish Landings in India, CMFRI Special Publication, ICAR-CMFRI, Kochi, 2005, vol. 86, pp. 1–57.
- Gupta, T., Karnad, D., Kottillil, S. and Gulland, E. M., Shark and ray research in India has low relevance to their conservation. Ocean Coast. Manage, 2022, 217, 106004.
- Vivekanandan, E. and Zala, M. S., Whale shark fishery of Veraval. Indian J. Fish., 1994, 41(1), 37–40.
- Pravin, P., Whale shark in the Indian coast – need for conservation. Curr. Sci., 2000, 79(3), 310–315.
- Akhilesh, K. V., Bineesh, K. K., Gopalakrishnan, A., Jena, J. K., Basheer, V. S. and Pillai, N. G. K., Checklist of chondrichthyans in Indian waters. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 2014, 56(2), 109–120.
- Sutaria, D., Parikh, A., Barnes, A. and Jabado, R., First record of the sandbar shark, Carcharhinus plumbeus (Chondrichthyes: Carcharhiniformes: Carcharhinidae) from Indian waters. Mar. Biodivers. Rec., 2015, 8, E126; doi:10.1017/S1755267215001025.
- Tyabji, Z., Jabado, R. W. and Sutaria, D., New records of sharks (Elasmobranchii) from the Andaman and Nicobar Archipelago in India with notes on current checklists. Biodivers. Data J., 2018, 6, e28593; https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e28593.
- Barnes, A., Sutaria, D., Harry, A. V. and Jabado, R. W., Demographics and length and weight relationships of commercially important sharks along the north‐western coast of India. Aquat. Conserv., 2018, 28(6), 1374–1383.
- Varghese, S. P., Vijayakumaran, K., Tiburtius, A. and Vaibhav, D. M., Diversity, abundance and size structure of pelagic sharks caught in tuna longline survey in the Indian seas. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci., 2015, 44(1), 26–36.
- Varghese, S. P., Unnikrishnan, N., Gulati, D. K. and Ayoob, A. E., Size, sex and reproductive biology of seven pelagic sharks in the eastern Arabian Sea. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK, 2017, 97(1), 181–196.
- Fernando, D. et al., New insights into the identities of the elasmo-branch fauna of Sri Lanka. Zootaxa, 2019, 4585(2), 201–238.
- Haque, A. B., White, W. T., Cavanagh, R. D., Biswas, A. R. and Hossain, N., New records of elasmobranchs in the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh: further taxonomic research is essential. Zootaxa, 2021, 5027(2), 211–230.
- Sukumaran, S. et al., Molecular analyses reveal a lack of genetic structuring in the scalloped hammerhead shark, Sphyrna lewini (Griffith & Smith, 1834) along the Indian coast. Mar. Biodivers., 2020, 50(2), 1–6; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-020-01040-4.
- Sreelekshmi, S., Sukumaran, S., Kishor, T. G., Sebastian, W. and Gopalakrishnan, A., Population genetic structure of the oceanic whitetip shark, Carcharhinus longimanus, along the Indian coast. Mar. Biodivers., 2020, 50(5), 1–5; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12526-020-01104-5.
- CMFRI-FSI-DoF, Marine Fisheries Census 2016 – India. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Indian Council of Agricultural Research; Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare; Fishery Survey of India and Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, 2020, pp. 1–116.
- Thomas, S. et al., Status of the hammerhead shark (Carcharhiniformes: Sphyrnidae) fishery in Indian waters with observations on the biology of scalloped hammerhead Sphyrna lewini (Griffith & Smith, 1834). Aquat. Conserv., 2021, 31(11), 3072–3086.
- Gupta, T. et al., Mitigation of elasmobranch bycatch in trawlers: a case study in Indian fisheries. Front. Mar. Sci., 2020, 7, 1–17; https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00571.
- Integrated Annual Report of Mangrove and Marine Biodiversity Conservation Foundation (Mangrove Foundation) 2015–16 to 2019–2020. Mangrove Cell, Mumbai, 2020, pp. 1–192.
- Beger, M., Harborne, A., Dacles, T., Solandt, J. and Ledesma, G., A framework of lessons learned from community-based marine reserves and its effectiveness in guiding a new coastal management initiative in the Philippines. Environ. Manage., 2005, 34, 786–801.
- Zacharia, P. U. et al., Non-Detriment Findings (NDF) for the Export of Shark and Ray Species Listed in Appendix II of the CITES and Harvested from Indian Waters, CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy Series-6, Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2017, pp. 1–102.
- CMFRI, Annual Report 2017–18. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2018, p. 304.